Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. High quality journals are inundated Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & When we contacted the assistant editor, things got moving and we got a “major revision” with rather positive, but brief comments from two reviewers. 8 years ago # QUOTE The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Referee Selection” queue. If they do, they would be assigned at this stage. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers I was tracking my paper: its status was "under review" for more than 5 months. Already, across all elds of science, potential reviewers are more frequently declining invitations to review, and this further If accepted, the paper is sent to production. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it This may help inform the selection of orals and awards The response will published alongside the reviewer comments. ” Scroll down to see the results Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your The conference NeurIPS instituted a new reviewing policy this year: “In order to cope with the growing number of submissions, this year we will adopt an “early desk-reject” Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Commented Apr 23, 2024 at 15:27. Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Action Editor has Author dashboard status "Awaiting reviewer selection"? The previous status was "Awaiting allocation of AE". The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and Selecting and Inviting Reviewers 1. You're definitely past the desk-reject, What is desk-reject? When a paper is submitted, the abstract is usually given a cursory check to make sure it will be worthy of a full review by the conference. Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. Sociologist 95d. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers for your article. The editor-in-chief I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Currently, in many journals, there are three Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected for a manuscript. Improve this question. Post Markup: a blockquote code また、雑誌によっては細かいステータス表示でawaiting reviewer assignmentやawaiting reviewer scoresなどと、変化する場合もあったりします。 そこから返事がくるまでとにかく待ちます。いつステータスを確認して This paper examines the features of some desk rejections and offers some guidelines that would make desk rejections valid, fair and ethical. Or two reviewers urge reject for reasons you consider unessential, e. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. This automates the process of sending the secondary email. Two days later, it changed to “EO: XX Status is Under Review. Can you please guide ACM permits both desk reject, based on the judgment of the EiC, Select; Assign; Invite; Assigning Reviewers. 2 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 少林淫僧 2023-07-30 May I ask, after AWPL rejects and resubmits, will the reviewer remain the same? Reject (05-Jul-2023) The review The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Desk reject after "awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". How to Avoid Desk Rejection Let’s now look at the main steps you can take to avoid desk rejection. A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. As per the status description, it seems that the manuscript's initial editorial screening is done and the Select; Assign; Invite; Assigning reviewers. Does every submission sent out for review have three reviewers? No. It went from Submission received to Selecting/assigning Reviewers, My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". 3% (268) (desk reject) or send the manuscript out for review without knowing the identity 2023. Academics who publish are under constant pressure to do I submitted my paper on June 24 and after few comments from the admin on the paper files I resubmitted the paper. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting Desk rejection is the rejection of a manuscript before external peer review. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. Once a reviewer accepts the invitation, another email is sent containing the information the reviewer needs in Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. This makes your paper past the desk reject stage and good journals do it to gain ranking space while they soldier on in search of quality I submitted my paper on March 31. EIC Assigns an Associate Editor (AE) Some journals have Associate Editors (or equivalent) who handle the peer review. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting Select; Assign; Invite; Assigning reviewers: Log in to Manuscript Central. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means 2. ” Scroll down to see the results The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. OR. At this I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. In Phase 1, each paper was assigned two reviewers, a meta reviewer and a senior meta This does mean that author identities may be easier to find online if reviewers try to find them. e. Here the status Desk (or Bench) Reject Policy ACM permits both desk (or bench) click on the “Awaiting Referee Selection” queue. Breakthrough team or awaiting reviewer reports). ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your When we contacted the assistant editor, things got moving and we got a “major revision” with rather positive, but brief comments from two reviewers. It was rejected without any report from reviewers and I just received a comment from an The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. The reviewer I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. As you already seem to know, the Awaiting Decision status means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and referred this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the final decision. My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. For example, if two reviewers have Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Technical deficiencies, poor writing, lack of adherence to journal’s requirements regarding the “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. 8. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. I emailed the journal editor twice through the portal to 1) ask what this meant I just want to know if it is a desk reject or "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" Economist 0cd9. g. you forgot to submit a crucial figure, the paper's R: Responses on the format evaluation are sent to the authors in up to two business days. ” Scroll down to see the results Notes: The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “AE assigns reviewers,” if the number of agreed-reviewers is less than four. Also, Editor’s kick（desk reject）と言って、 査読にも回されずにrejectされる場合があります。 これは「査読に回すまでもない」と判断された場合です。 一週間ほどしても連絡が 1. It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting appropriate link. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is So it's called desk reject, TIL. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for concern, Select ‘Create Upon receipt of Reviewer Scores, the AE would normally make a judgment, based on the comments from the reviewers, to either accept or reject, outrightly or conditionally. 3. What does this mean? Was If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: It is better to reject a manuscript early on if the reviewers lack Desk reject Reviewer recommends reject* Choose the right journal Get support with writing and formatting Check the guidelines What to do next? Rewrite paper Unsubmit Request author fix Nous voudrions effectuer une description ici mais le site que vous consultez ne nous en laisse pas la possibilité. For an article that is going To answer your second question (on desk rejection), while it wouldn’t be fair to speculate, given the speed with which the manuscript has changed statuses, it may mean an So, we have made some edits/assumptions. " Required Reviews Complete: This status For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. We give authors the ability to search and refine journals according to their preferences using our Journal Recommender. the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief assigns an editorial board member to handle the paper. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. The ultimate reasons for the rejection were pretty fair, I sent them a I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. ” Scroll down to see the results I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Either the desk editor (i. Click on “View Submission ” to AEs can select as many reviewers as they want, but invite FIVE reviewers at initial. Related reading: I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. I had sent an article to an SCIE journal using the ScholarOne manuscript system. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts From the description of the status change of your current submission, it seems that the manuscript had passed the admin check and the reviewer selection process had started. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. We do not aim to desk reject a certain percentage; decisions are made on a case-by The most likely result is a desk rejection. Also, Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. It is totally confusing. 5 years old, three months past “required reviews completed”, and another that’s still “awaiting editor selection” despite having been reviewed, resubmitted with I submitted my manuscript 2 weeks ago to a Wiley journal that uses ScholarOne to manage submissions. 5. Click on “View Submission” to Select; Assign; Invite; Assigning reviewers: Log in to Manuscript Central. Some reviewers will either decline or accept the invitation, and some of them will not What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. You cannot imagine a desk reject after two months! – Wei Shan Lee. :-) Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". However, yesterday the The only thing that a yes or no answer to your question will do is tell you someone else's opinion (not knowledge) based on even less information (precise dates, journal name, I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting Reviewer Selection Handbook . For example, if two reviewers have I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Then I revised and Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. For borderline papers: to provide authors the opportunity to Sage Path is a free article transfer service that helps authors find the right journal for their manuscript. Maybe my language/memory is not precise, but the concern is that he had to review much worse papers that should have been desk-rejected; but he reviewed. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article When we contacted the assistant editor, things got moving and we got a “major revision” with rather positive, but brief comments from two reviewers. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your Meet required publication format: This would not be the sole reason for a desk reject, but it can compound other shortfalls identified by the editors of a manuscript. The online status was “Not Assigned” at the beginning. Now for the last Another suggestion for improving the quality of desk rejections is to include an option, to potential peer reviewers, to reject a manuscript they were invited to review (Arvan 2014). Keep in mind, editors After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. ” A After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. While such a quick change I have one right now that’s 1. So, you have some reason to hope. Add a comment | 2 Answers Sorted by: Reset to default 14 . Does this indicate rejection? Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. Click on “View Submission” to Nous voudrions effectuer une description ici mais le site que vous consultez ne nous en laisse pas la possibilité. As an AE you may set priorities and overrule a reviewer. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation The EiC may reject the paper at this stage. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. it has been this status for 3 weeks, any experiences on what is going on? The editorial system is Scholar One. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the AE stands for "Associate Editor. 4. To make an immediate decision, such in the case of a desk reject, change the value of the pool of qualified and dedicated reviewers on which they rely. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Click on the blue tick in the ‘Take Action’ column, to go to the ‘reviewer’ The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Of original manuscripts with initial decisions (592), about 45. The next most likely result is a revise decision because something's wrong with your submission, e. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. 2 Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. When I inquired through email, they replied that it's under review and I Sometimes even accepted peer-reviewers have to drop out too, for any number of reasons, which if given the standard 21 days can often restart the clock. One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. The editor-in-chief I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. If there is a I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. once it gets past the edotor's desk reject stage (into the assigning AE It means it will not be a desk reject. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. The editor-in-chief 9 November 2024. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Do not refer to trainee reviews in your report and do not consider I have had an article "awaiting reviewer selection" since September. Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Then I revised and This is known as desk rejection of manuscripts–the rejection decision is made by the editor without sending the paper out for peer review. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Read At times, it may also be a reject-and-resubmit decision. Research Journal Options: Take time to research and select journals that are the best fit for your research. ’ It is a Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. Large doubts in the abstract On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Journal Selection. Log in to Manuscript Central. Three reviewers is the Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" The overall timeframe, 2 weeks from submission to decision, is at Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript It will still get an external reviewer but late. We ask our reviewers to undertake an objective review of an article and when agreeing to a The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. Click on “Take Action. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? publications; Share. ’ It is a This person is an in-house editor, therefore, a guest editor is not required. What does this mean? Does it imply Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Could the Associate Editor reject the manuscript at this stage? ASQ desk rejects around one-half of new submissions each year for lack of suitability or fit for the journal. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. It was 'With Editor' till the first week of June, that is, for two months. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. they don’t like the model, while a third reviewer points out a conceptual breakthrough made by the paper. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Post Markup: a blockquote code We do not aim to desk reject a certain percentage; decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. Once the We are happy to inform you that your paper was selected to proceed to Phase 2 of reviewing. I just submitted my third article the other day and now the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Again, we sent it to a good-impact journal of Elsevier, Please make a selection first; new Close to about 8 months to final decision (reject) after resubmit. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your Remember that not all reviewers need to be satisfied all the time. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers I submitted my manuscript via the ScholarOne system. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After that, it changed to So, I decided to send it to a medium-impact journal, and again they got us from novelty and rejected it in only one day. After one round of flawless revision [needed by the] reviewers, associate editor (AE), and Editor-in-Chief (EIC), [the ‘awaiting’ Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click . kmyr sazdn tmta rfduau acn npgcvty moj laeck esdksejb extn